The Proof You’re Looking For Is the Problem
When a career changes without your permission — or even when it changes by your own hand — the real battle isn’t finding the next job. It’s getting out of your own way.
“Most people, when confronted with a choice of changing their thoughts or proving there is no need to change, get busy on the proof.” — John Maynard Keynes
Read that again. Slowly.
Keynes was an economist, but that line cuts straight to the heart of something I watch play out in my work every single day: the extraordinary lengths people will go to in order to avoid confronting what a genuine change of direction actually requires of them.
I talk to a lot of people in transition. Some chose it — they walked away from a corporate career, a demanding boss, a commute that was eating their life. Others had it chosen for them — a layoff notice, a restructuring announcement, a role that simply disappeared. The circumstances are different. The internal battle they face is almost always the same.
The Comfortable Conclusion
The moment a person starts seriously exploring franchise ownership, something interesting happens. They begin researching — which is good. But very quickly, the research starts bending toward a predetermined destination: the conclusion that now is not the right time, that it’s too risky, that they should probably just update the résumé and find another job like the last one.
That is what Keynes was describing. Not apathy. Not laziness. Something far more sophisticated — the human mind working overtime to prove that the comfortable choice is actually the rational one.
And it is convincing work. I’ve watched brilliant people build airtight cases for staying exactly where they are — or retreating to exactly where they were — using logic, data, and perfectly reasonable-sounding concerns. The franchise is too expensive. The market is uncertain. They need more time to think about it. Maybe next year.
Maybe next year has a way of becoming maybe the year after that.
What a Forced Change Actually Reveals
Here’s what I’ve come to believe after years of working with people in career transition: a layoff or a forced career change is one of the most clarifying events that can happen to a professional. Not comfortable. Clarifying.
It strips away the inertia. It removes the excuse of “I’d explore this if I weren’t so busy at work.” It creates — sometimes for the first time in decades — the actual space and urgency to ask a question most people keep quietly on the shelf: What do I actually want this next chapter to look like?
That question is dangerous, because it has an honest answer. And the honest answer often doesn’t look like another round of the same thing.
The people I’ve seen build genuinely successful second acts — through franchise ownership, through entrepreneurship, through real ownership of their own income — weren’t the ones who had the most certainty. They were the ones willing to sit with uncertainty long enough to let something new take shape.
The Proof Is Not the Point
When someone I’m working with starts listing reasons why franchise ownership probably won’t work for them, I don’t argue with the list. The list is usually accurate on the surface — there are real costs, real risks, real unknowns. I acknowledge every one of them.
What I ask instead is a different question: What would have to be true for this to be worth exploring seriously?
That question does something. It interrupts the proof-building. It pivots from “why not” to “what if.” And more often than not, the person sitting across from me already knows the answer. They’ve been carrying it quietly beneath all the rational objections.
Franchise ownership isn’t for everyone — I’m the first person to say that. But the people who discover it isn’t right for them through genuine exploration are in an entirely different position than the people who decided it wasn’t right for them before they ever looked closely. One has real information. The other just has a very polished argument.
A Different Kind of Proof
If you’re in transition right now — by choice or by circumstance — I’d invite you to notice where your mind is spending its energy. Is it genuinely evaluating your options? Or is it methodically building a case for the option that requires the least change?
There is no shame in that tendency. It is deeply human. Keynes didn’t describe it as a character flaw — he described it as a near-universal pattern. The difference between people who move forward and people who don’t often isn’t courage or capital or the right market conditions. It’s the willingness to pause the proof-building long enough to ask whether the conclusion deserves a second look.
Your career just changed. Maybe you changed it. Maybe it was changed for you. Either way, the window you’re standing in front of right now is real. What it reveals is up to you.
About the Author
Mike Martuza is a Senior Franchise Consultant and Partner with Franchise Consulting Company and author of The Franchise Rules: The No-Nonsense Guide to Finding a Franchise That Fits." With decades of experience in entrepreneurship, coaching, and strategic business development, Mike helps aspiring business owners find the right franchise that aligns with their goals, values, and lifestyle. Contact Mike at mikemartuza@thefranchiseconsultingcompany.com.











